<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Agents on s4yhii&#39;s blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.s4yhii.com/tags/agents/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agents on s4yhii&#39;s blog</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.s4yhii.com/tags/agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>I Built a Hackbot That Had to Prove Its Bugs</title>
      <link>https://blog.s4yhii.com/posts/i-built-a-hackbot/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.s4yhii.com/posts/i-built-a-hackbot/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everything here happened inside bug bounty programs, in scope and with permission. I reviewed every finding and submitted it by hand. Third-party data is redacted, and the examples were disclosed before publication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the past few months, I have been testing whether AI can handle the repetitive parts of bug bounty hunting without deciding on its own that a bug is real. Mapping sites, reading JavaScript, comparing requests and revisiting old leads takes time, so I wanted a helper that could keep doing that work and bring me only what deserved a closer look.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
